Review - Summary of the reasons
Since the requests for opinion being examined by the Advisory Committee are configured as an expression of the institutional functions referred to in art. 13 of the RD 30/10/1933, n. 1611, even if exercised against the same State Attorney for the activities in which it acts as an active administration, and the consultative activity in question relates to matters potentially subject to litigation, as such removed from access pursuant to art. 2, paragraph 1, lett. a) of the Prime Ministerial Decree of 26 January 1996, n. 200, according to which «Pursuant to art. 24, paragraph 1, of the law of 7 August 1990, n. 241, by virtue of the professional secrecy already provided for by the law, in order to safeguard confidentiality in the relationship between the defender and the defendant, the "opinions rendered in relation to potential or ongoing litigation and the inherent correspondence" are withdrawn from access ", rule that falls within the cases of absolute exception referred to in paragraph 3 of art. 5 bis of the legislative decree n. 33/2013, as confirmed by the sentence of the Lazio Regional Administrative Court, Section I, 25 June 2019, n. 8264, the application was rejected.